By Bill McMorris | Statehouse News
ALEXANDRIA — Trial lawyers have turned campaign contributions to attorneys general into lucrative contracts through class action lawsuits and no-bid contracts, according to a new report.
For more than 10 years, attorneys general in all 50 states have raked in millions in campaign donations from plaintiff lawyers. Some of those officials have awarded contracts to donors to represent government entities in multibillion dollar lawsuits, according to a new report from the Manhattan Institute, a conservative advocacy group based in New York.
States have turned to civil courts to punish polluters, investment firms and pharmaceutical companies to recover taxpayer money. The most notable class action involving state governments came in 1998 when cigarette manufacturers agreed to send more than $200 billion to states during a 25-year period to compensate for medical costs associated with smoking. Plaintiff attorneys took home more than $30 billion in that case.
In many cases, attorneys general contract out similar class action lawsuits to private trial lawyers, who earn a percentage of money won in civil trial or settlement. The legal community has opened up its wallets for the attorneys general, who control the purse strings on contracts.
In 2007, lawyers provided Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood, a Democrat, with 45 percent of his campaign’s $1.8 million warchest, according to the report. Among his many donors was the Texas law firm Bailey Perrin Bailey, which contributed $75,000. When Mississippi sued drug maker Eli Lilly for failing to disclose the link between its anti-psychotic drug Zyprexa and diabetes, Hood’s office awarded the firm with the contract. The firm earned a lucrative payday after reaching an $18.5 million settlement for the state.
“Of course we cannot prove that this contract was awarded based solely on a campaign donation — I cannot emphasize that enough — but it certainly raises eyebrows and creates an appearance of impropriety at minimum,” James Copland, director of the institute’s Center for Legal Policy, said on a Monday morning teleconference.
Neither Hood nor representatives for Bailey returned calls for comment.
Some public policy groups are looking to bring transparency to state legal contracting. The American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, a free market think tank based in Washington, D.C., that provides model legislation for government, has been working with state lawmakers to crack down on no-bid contracting for more than a decade.
“There may be times when an outside attorney may have the expertise needed for a case and a contract is necessary,” said Amy Kjose, director of ALEC’s Civil Justice Task Force. “But these contracts are generally written without any public scrutiny, legislative oversight or disclosure.”
ALEC bundled its reform ideas into model legislation, known as the Private Attorney Retention Sunshine Act. The proposal calls for a competitive bidding process to prevent politically motivated contracts; establish legislative oversight; and set fee caps to limit economic incentives. Eleven states have adopted elements of the bill.
“I expect that more states will continue to look at it next year,” Kjose said.
Former Attorney General Ed Meese joined Copland in supporting such measures.
“The opportunities for actual corruption and improper relationships are extremely great,” Meese said. “It’s a situation in which state legislators really ought to be paying attention.”

